AU/MIN/AGRI/1

CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF AGRICULTURE OF THE AFRICAN UNION
Maputo, Mozambique
1-2 July, 2003

Preparatory Meeting of Experts
1 July 2003

Item 1 of the Provisional Agenda

THE STATE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN AFRICA 2003


Introduction
Food Security and Agriculture
Agricultural Performance in Africa
Agricultural Trade Performance
Improving Agriculture's Contribution to Poverty Reduction
Food Security and HIV/AIDS in Africa
Response under NEPAD

Annex Table 1: Prevalence of Undernourishment in Africa
Annex Table 2: Net Agricultural Production Growth Rates
Annex Table 3: Real GDP (annual percentage change)
Annex Table 4: Statistical Profiles of African Countries
Annex Table 5: A Comparative Profile of African Countries
Annex Table 6: A Comparative Profile of African Countries (part two)


Introduction

Agriculture dominates the economies of most African countries, providing jobs, income and exports. The sector employs about 60 percent of the population and contributes 20 percent of the continent's export earnings are due to agricultural activities. A stronger performing agricultural sector is fundamental for Africa's overall economic growth. A constantly growing agricultural sector is crucial for addressing hunger, poverty and inequality. More than 70 percent of the total population and the majority of the extreme poor and undernourished live in rural areas. A healthy agriculture sector means more jobs, more income and more food for the poor.

Improving agricultural performance generates income in both rural and urban areas. As incomes increase, households save more and spend more, stimulating growth and investment in other sectors. Agriculture provides tax revenues and supplies a wide range of raw materials to agriculturally-based local manufacturers. Processing agricultural products accounts for two-thirds of manufacturing value-added in most African countries.

FAO has prepared this special report on the State of Food and Agriculture in Africa for the Africa Union Ministerial Meeting on 2 July 2003 and the preparatory meeting of experts on 1 July. The report aims to promote discussion and encourage actions to enhance agriculture's contributions to economic growth and hunger reduction.

Food Security and Agriculture

The principal reasons for placing priority on agricultural development in Africa are: (i) the alarming country level trends in undernourishment; and (ii) the high levels of undernourishment. Table 1 provides undernourishment indicators by sub-region for Africa (Annex Table 1 provides numbers and trends in undernourishment at regional and individual country level). In 1998-2000, more than a quarter of the population of Africa was chronically undernourished (202 million people).

The data in Table 2 present trends in food security and poverty indicators by region, emphasizing the urgency for African countries. The numbers of people living on less than $1 per day is expected to increase by 45 million in Africa between 1999 and 2015, while in the other developing regions, the poverty numbers are expected to decrease by 330 million. Expectations are similar for the numbers of undernourished during this same period, with 6 million more in sub-Saharan Africa and substantial decreases in Asia and Latin America. Finally, the average regional food consumption level in Africa is expected to increase only by 7 percent in the next 15 years to 2360 kcal/person/day compared with 2700 for South Asia, 2980 for Latin America and 3060 for East Asia.

The prevalence of undernourishment in Sub-Saharan Africa has declined only slightly over the past two decades, from 36 percent to 33 percent. FAO projects a decline in the proportion of undernourished in Sub-Saharan Africa to 22 percent by 2015. Unfortunately, as noted in Table 2, the absolute number is expected to increase from 168 million in 1990/92 to 205 million in 2015. In North Africa the prevalence of under-nourishment is projected to fall to 4 percent.

Table 1: Prevalence of Undernourishment in Africa

  Number of people undernourished Proportion of undernourished
in total population
  1969-71 1979-81 1990-92 1998-00 1969-71 1979-81 1990-92 1998-00
  millions percent
North Africa 19.3 7.4 5.5 6.2 27 8 5 4
Sub-Saharan Africa 91.9 125.4 166.4 195.9 35 36 35 33
Central Africa 10.4 15.1 22.0 45.1 30 34 35 57
East Africa 39.7 42.5 73.7 83.0 44 35 44 41
Southern Africa 13.1 17.0 34.0 37.1 33 33 48 43
West Africa 28.7 50.7 36.7 30.7 30 40 21 14

Source: FAO

Table 2: Food and Hunger Indicators by Region

  Year Sub-Saharan Africa Near East and North Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America and Caribbean Developing Countries
Per capita food consumption (kcal/person/day)
  1964-66 2058 2290 2017 1957 2393 2054
  1997-99 2195 3006 2403 2921 2824 2681
  2015 2360 3090 2700 3060 2980 2850
 
Millions of persons undernourished
  1990-92 168 25 289 275 59 815
  1997-99 194 32 303 193 54 776
  2015 205 37 195 135 40 610
 
Millions of Persons in Poverty (US$1/day)
  1990 242 6 495 452 74 1269
  1999 300 7 490 260 77 1134
  2015 345 6 279 59 60 749

Source: FAO

During the 1990s, ten African countries reduced the number of undernourished. One important example is Ghana, where the number of undernourished fell from 5.1 million in 1989-91 to 2.2 million in 1998-2000 (Box 1 presents background information on Ghana's achievements). However, at the end of the 1990s, thirty countries had more than 20 percent of their population undernourished and in 18 of these countries, more than 35 percent of the population were chronically hungry.

The damaging consequences of hunger and malnutrition on human productivity are increasingly documented and understood. Recent evidence demonstrates that hunger can have severe negative effects on the growth rates of countries with a high prevalence of undernourishment. FAO's work on the links between hunger and economic growth suggests that for sub-Saharan Africa, the economic cost of hunger and malnutrition, as reflected in lost productivity, illness and death, is high. Over the period 1960 to 1990, countries in the region could have attained an average per-caput GDP level of US$ 2200 by 1990 if undernourishment had been eliminated. Instead, the region's average GDP per capita in 1990 was just US $800 per year

Reducing the incidence of hunger is essential in order to increase agricultural productivity and achieve higher rates of growth. People suffering from hunger are marginalised within the economy, contributing little to output and still less to demand. Investing in reducing hunger is a moral imperative and it also makes economic sense.

Improved agricultural growth is essential if Africa is to reduce poverty and hunger. Agricultural-led development generates economic growth, lowers the burden of food imports and opens the way to expanding exports. Increasing agricultural productivity, expanding exports and producing higher value crops all raise agricultural profitability and the incomes of those involved. Land owners, agricultural workers, input suppliers, retailers and the entire chain of activities servicing agriculture benefit. Labour incomes increase as the unemployed find work and the underemployed find more work.

An important message emerging from Africa's experience is the opportunity for agriculture to improve its contributions to poverty and hunger reduction. A well educated and trained rural population, with access to roads, health care facilities, irrigation and locally appropriate production technologies will produce consistently higher yields. Investments in human welfare and rural infrastructure, together with improved access to local and international markets will lower production costs, raise profits, improve competitiveness and produce greater incomes.

Agricultural Performance in Africa

Africa includes a heterogeneous group of countries with diverse resource endowments and economies. Agricultural conditions vary widely both among and within countries. African countries do share a number of worrisome characteristics and trends, however. Examples include a high degree of production variability, relatively low crop yields and dependency on primary exports with low income elasticity of demand and high price volatility. Relative to other developing regions, Africa's agriculture is undercapitalized, uncompetitive and underperforming.

It should be noted that in addition to showing diversity among countries, agriculture within each country is generally dualistic: a) small scale agriculture - including livestock, fisheries and forestry- ranging from semi-subsistence to small scale commercial; b) large scale agriculture. Indeed, the very performance profile of agriculture is itself dualistic, with the tabulated figures on performance and on the contribution of small scale and large scale agriculture to the region's food supplies, sub-regional and international trade unable to reveal the wide range that exists in reality. For lack of space, the contrasting performance, challenges and opportunities that apply to these sub-sectors cannot be explored in this paper but they should be fully recognised in crafting solutions in future.

Table 3 presents a range of agricultural indicators, highlighting how sub-Saharan Africa falls well below other developing regions in the proportion of area irrigated, value added per worker, fertilizer levels, and productivity growth in both crops and livestock activities. In sub-Saharan Africa less than 4 percent of the cropped area is irrigated; value added per worker in agriculture has to double to equal Latin America; and cereal yields would have to more than double to match South Asia.

Agriculture's relatively weak, and often declining performance is symptomatic of inadequate investments in agricultural infrastructure, in particular water control, rural roads and storage facilities, human capital, research and extension networks, and long-term crisis management. The longer these basic investments are delayed the less competitive agriculture becomes as the costs to produce, process and market agricultural products increase.



The consequences of further delay are dire. Africa is the only region where average food production per person has been declining during the past 40 years, putting large segments of the population at risk of food insecurity and malnutrition (Figure 1). Africa is the only developing region where FAO projects the numbers of undernourished and the numbers of poor to increase by 2015 (Table 2).

Table 3: Agricultural Indicators by Region

  Africa Sub-Saharan Africa Near East and North Africa South Asia East Asia and Pacific Latin America and Caribbean Middle income countries High income countries World
Proportion of arable land irrigated 7.0 3.8 28.7 39.3 31.9 11.6 19.9 11.9 20.0
Added value per worker in 1999 ($/year) 416 285 1 859 412 461 3 028 335 17 956 645
Per capita cereal production 1997/99 (kg/year) 147 128 128 224 336 259 339 746 349
Cereal yield 1997/99 (kg/ha) 1 225 986 1 963 2 308 4 278 2 795 2 390 4 002 2 067
Livestock productivity 1997/99(kg/ha) 164 128 147 121 150 198 191 248 193
Fertilizer use 1997/99 (kg/ha) 22 9 69 109 241 85 111 125 100

Source: FAO

Figure 1: Total and per capita food production for Africa

(Index: 1989-91=100)

Source: FAOSTAT

Agricultural growth in Africa requires an increase in agricultural productivity, in particular through investment in water control and other rural infrastructures, a much more dynamic trade sector and adequate incentives to switch to higher value crops, to invest in sustainable practices and to improve incomes of rural households -- both directly as land owners and agricultural workers, and indirectly as input suppliers, marketers, processors, retailers, exporters and food consumers.

The importance of improving productivity is highlighted in Table 4. The data depict a weather- dependent agricultural sector. For the past three decades, all the major agricultural activities display both low growth rates and large variations in production. To a large extent, irregular and unreliable rainfall determines yield levels and the state of food security for the vast majority of Africa's poor. The unpredictable production leads to volatile price changes from season to season, sending confusing signals to both producers and consumers.

The average annual agricultural growth rate for sub-Saharan Africa during 1967 to 1997 was around 2 percent. FAO projections suggest growth rates between 2 percent and 3 percent over the period to 2030. For the same period in North Africa, agricultural growth was 3 percent, with FAO projections pointing to a 2 percent growth rate over the next 30 years. Yield increases provided the main source of production growth in North Africa (between 1961 and 1997), contributing more than 60 percent. In Sub-Saharan Africa , expanding the area in production contributed 40 percent of the growth; cropping intensity and yield increases contributed around 25 percent and 35 percent respectively. Africa's population growth between 1967 and 1997 outpaced agricultural output growth, so that output per caput actually declined over this period.

Table 4: Net Agriculture Production: Average Annual Growth Rates for Africa

  1970-74 1975-79 1980-84 1985-89 1990-94 1995-99 2000-02
Agriculture 1.7 0.6 0.7 3.0 2.1 3.3 0.3
Cereals 3.4 -0.8 -1.8 4.1 3.8 3.5 1.9
Crops 2.2 -0.5 0.4 3.4 2.6 3.9 0.3
Food 1.9 0.7 0.7 3.1 2.4 3.4 0.4
Livestock 0.7 3.3 1.5 2.0 1.1 2.3 0.5

Source: FAOSTAT

Food crops cover about 60 percent of total arable area in sub-Saharan Africa. The rural poor and food insecure derive the bulk of their income from the production of staples, or from activities related to staple production. For the continent as a whole, annual per caput production of cereals has fluctuated between 140 kg and 175 kg during the 1990s -- far below the global average of 358 kg. Production growth in cereals for sub-Saharan Africa over the past 30 years was around 2.5 percent per annum, and is expected to stay roughly at this level for the next 30 years.

FAO forecasts that Africa's growth in agricultural output during the next thirty years (1995-97 to 2030), will come mainly from yield increases in North Africa (except for Egypt). Area expansion and cropping intensity will make relatively small contributions. In sub-Saharan Africa, FAO projections indicate that 25 percent of future production gains will come from an increase in arable land and 75 percent will come from a combination of yield increases (62 percent) and cropping intensity (13 percent). Arable land expansion is expected to slow compared to historical rates, yet increases of some 57 million hectares by 2030 are predicted.

The fishery and forestry sectors make important contributions to African economies. FAO projections suggest that per capita fish consumption levels will not grow from their relatively low, 1999 levels (6.8 kg) during the next 15 years. Local wild stocks are close to being fully exploited so imports would have to expand by 46 percent by 2015 to maintain 1999 consumption levels. While aquaculture has expanded rapidly in Africa during the past decade, Egypt accounts for most of the expansion and production. In 1999, Egypt accounted for 80 percent of total African production. Aquaculture contributes less than 1 percent of total fish supplies.

Fishery production (including capture production from inland and marine waters plus aquaculture production) in African countries ranged from 4.9 million to 5.9 million metric tonnes in the 1990-98 period. Since 1994, fishery production has been increasing at an average rate of 3.5 percent per year. Among the five African geographical groupings, West Africa and Southern Africa are the two major contributors to the total fishery production of the continent.

Forestry, too, continues to play a significant role in the formal economy of many countries of the region. Of the 530 million cubic meters of timber produced in the region in 1998, almost 90 percent was used for fuel wood and charcoal. Most trade in fuel wood and charcoal is within national boundaries. Box 2 outlines the recently completed Forestry Outlook Study for Africa, providing a  20 - year perspective and long-term planning framework for development of the sector.

Agricultural Trade Performance

Increasing trade and market opportunities locally, regionally and internationally contribute to agriculture's ability to grow, expand incomes and reduce poverty and food insecurity. Trade often introduces new, more productive and more sustainable production technologies, processing systems and related services. Trade provides opportunities to produce higher value products. For many producers, expanding agricultural trade opportunities locally and within the region is an important first step for taking advantage of potential new access international markets. However, according to a recent paper,1 trade continues to be marked by overwhelming dependence on traditional overseas markets in industrial countries, although (admittedly from a low base), there has been substantial growth in intra-regional trade within Africa. If we exclude unrecorded, often informal-sector, trade across the porous borders, on average, only 10 percent of exports of countries belonging to each African Regional Economic Organisation are destined within itself. Due to greater economic complementarity (South Africa, Zimbabwe and Mauritius being significantly industrialised), the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) shows the highest intra-community trade, with 31 percent of exports and 17 percent of imports being traded among its membership. Intra-community exports and imports for ECOWAS are just under 20 percent while for CENSAD, the ratios are about 12 percent (exports) and about 10 percent (imports).

Apart from what is often claimed to be a significant informal manufacturing sector, which may well dominate post-harvest processing in the region, at present, a characteristic of too many African countries is a relatively undiversified economy with little industry and manufacturing and exports dominated by one or two raw commodities. Often a single, primary agricultural commodity is the major source of export earnings, creating a source of uncertainty because of their low income elasticity of demand and their declining and volatile terms of trade. Figure 2 lists several African countries highly dependent on a single agricultural commodity for their export revenues. Overall, Africa's agricultural sector accounts for about 20 percent of total merchandise exports, declining from more than 50 percent in the 1960s (Figure 3).

Over the past 30 years, agricultural imports have outstripped agricultural exports, making the region a net agricultural importer since 1980 (Figure 4). Indeed, as population growth in Africa outpaces food production, imports and food aid are required to make up the difference (Figure 5). In the mid-1990s, out of the world total of 32 million victims of disasters receiving relief assistance from the World Food Programme (WFP), 21.5 million were living in Africa. In 2000 Africa received 2.8 million tonnes of food aid, which is more than a quarter of the world total. In 2001, the number of people suffering from food emergencies ranged between 23 and 28 million. Box 3 provides background information on recent food emergencies in Africa.

Figure 2: Dependence on a Single Agricultural Export Product 1999-2001:
Percentage of Merchandise Export Earnings

Source: FAOSTAT

Figure 3: Agricultural Export and Import Values and Share in Total Merchandise Trade

Source: FAOSTAT

Figure 4: Agricultural Trade Africa: Surplus to Deficit

Source: FAOSTAT

Figure 5: Cereal Production and Trade

Source: FAOSTAT

Improving Agriculture's Contribution to Poverty Reduction

As more data and studies become available on how economies sustain growth and promote more equal income distribution, the evidence demonstrates that agricultural growth has a stronger impact on poverty reduction than growth in other sectors and that agricultural growth has beneficial impacts on both rural and urban poverty. Growth in urban-based sectors does not have same reciprocal beneficial impacts on rural poverty, but urban, peri-urban agriculture and family type agroprocessing in cities are important factors for reducing poverty.

Past experience points to macroeconomic policies as the largest source of disincentives to agricultural growth. The macroeconomic framework has improved in many countries, yet the agenda is incomplete in many others. Price transmission from both domestic and world markets to the farm gate need improvement. It is essential that producers gain from opportunities. In many cases, the decline in international prices of some traditional crops such as cereals requires enhanced incentives for alternative high-value crops and activities.

Commitment to agriculture and rural development is a prerequisite for successful agricultural and rural development, implying that public spending decisions as well as policies should be examined and any bias against the sector should be removed. Addressing the enormous deficiencies of the region in terms of rural infrastructure, in particular water control, rural roads and storage facilities, is an essential step towards expanded investment in the agricultural and rural sectors.

In many countries, the share of public spending on agriculture does not reflect the importance of agriculture in the economy. In fact, at the regional level, the trends in lending to agriculture are declining. In Sub-Saharan Africa, national government expenditure on agriculture as a share of total expenditure declined from around 6.3 percent in 1990/91 to 4.6 percent by the end of the decade. International assistance is also in decline. Data in Table 5 shows how external assistance (concessional) to agriculture from international sources declined by 36 percent during the 1990s. Both national governments and international donors need to examine the reasons for this decline and the need to reverse it. Development assistance, investments and related resources for rural Africa are required at both international and national levels if agriculture is to prosper and contribute to growth.

Table 5: External Assistance to Agriculture*

Year Million US$ (at constant 1995 prices)
  Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Developing
1990 $3,657 $4,218
2000 $2,350 $2,654
Change -36% -37%

*: External assistance to agriculture refers to FAO's Broad definition of concessional lending to agriculture.

Food Security and HIV/AIDS in Africa

An issue for special attention is HIV/AIDS and its links to food security. In its assessment of the Southern Africa crisis in September 2002, the Special Envoy of the United Nations for Humanitarian Needs in Southern Africa highlighted the HIV/AIDS pandemic as a fundamental, underlying cause of vulnerability in the region that represented the single largest threat to its people and societies and as a contributing factor to acute vulnerability.2 Similarly, a recent SADC food security Ministerial Brief states that HIV/AIDS directly contributes to, and is compounded by, food insecurity, and indicates that HIV/AIDS food insecurity linkages may be many and long-lasting.3 The implications of HIV/AIDS for food security are interwoven with aspects of governance, social sector performance, a functioning private sector, and macro-economic performance.4

Worldwide, trends are alarming, as shown in Table 6. However, around 70 percent of the 42 million people worldwide with HIV live in Africa, where AIDS is now the leading cause of death. The food security implications of the epidemic are likely to be most pronounced in sub-Saharan Africa, where the adverse impact is being compared in importance to that of recurrent droughts and other factors.

Table 6: Regional HIV/AIDS Statistics and Features, end of 2002

Region Epidemic started Adults and children living with HIV/AIDS Adults and children newly infected with HIV Adult prevalence rate % of HIV positive adult who are women
Sub-Saharan Africa late '70s to early '80s 29.4 million 3.5 million 8.8% 58%
North Africa &Middle East late '80s 550 000 83 000 0.3% 55%
South & South-East Asia late '80s 6.0 million 700 000 0.6% 36%
East Asia & Pacific late '80s 1.2 million 270 000 0.1% 24%
Latin America late '70s early '80s 1.5 million 150 000 0.6% 30%
Caribbean late '70s to early '80s 440 000 60 000 2.4% 50%
Eastern Europe & Central Asia early '90s 1.2 million 250 000 0.6% 27%

Source: adapted from UNAIDS (2002): AIDS Epidemic Update, December 2002

The linkages between HIV/AIDS and food security are bi-directional. Poverty-induced malnutrition is likely to lead to an earlier onset of AIDS, due to an increased susceptibility to opportunistic infections. The epidemic impoverishes households through loss of labour in agriculture and other livelihood activities; increased cost of health care and funerals; diminished capacity to care for children and other vulnerable individuals; and erosion of the asset base. Governments and donors need to adopt a development-oriented approach in addressing its effects on food security with a long horizon rather than merely a disaster relief approach. Clearly, there is need for governments to find new and innovative ways of linking short- and long-term responses and to increase their commitment to addressing the structural vulnerabilities that underlie acute crisis situations. There must be balance in funding for short-term, food-based responses and longer-term non-food based interventions.

Food security interventions should be carried out with an "HIV/AIDS lens" and be complemented with HIV-specific interventions if they are to contribute to reducing HIV infection and to mitigating the impact of the epidemic. As HIV infection spreads and more people fall ill and die, the impact on food security is likely to increase and outweigh the relative importance of other factors. A food security response to the epidemic, linking short- and long-term interventions is imperative. Such a response needs to address food production, food access and nutritional aspects.

Food security policies and programmes need to be adjusted to enhance resilience to HIV/AIDS as a new element among household, community and national shocks, which requires different mechanisms from those used in the past. Increased morbidity and mortality have reduced resilience to shocks communities were once able to cope with. Measures to address the long-term, structural factors fuelling the double crisis of food insecurity and HIV/AIDS range from reform of a wide range of policies; ensuring sustainable access to affordable agricultural inputs; addressing gender inequalities; prioritising human capacity and institution building for rural service delivery; focusing on long-term labour shortages created by the epidemic; effective participation of the vulnerable in policy improvement; and attention to the needs of Africa's nearly 14 million orphans in need of care, food and livelihood-building prospects.

Response under NEPAD

Document AU/MIN/AGRI/2 on responding to the food security and agricultural challenges and Document AU/MIN/AGRI/3 presenting the Action Plan for agriculture of the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) offer a basis for discussion of what Africa can do to respond to the sombre situation portrayed by this status report. The actions proposed in those documents come in the context of the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) prepared by the NEPAD Secretariat with FAO assistance5. NEPAD draws the attention of member governments to a wide range of actions to revitalize African agriculture and provides a framework for harmonised and collaborative responsive action. Five specific opportunities for improving Africa's agriculture outlined by NEPAD are presented: (1) extend the area under sustainable land management and reliable water control systems; (2) improve rural infrastructure and trade-related capacities for market access; (3) increase food supply and reduce hunger; (4) improve agricultural research, technology dissemination and adoption; (5) improve responses to disasters and emergencies.

NEPAD's overall vision for agriculture seeks to maximise the contribution of Africa's largest economic sector to achieve a self-reliant and productive Africa that can play its full part on the world stage. Box 4 highlights some important impediments to African agricultural renewal identified in the NEPAD study: the NEPAD agriculture programme offers some of the solutions to the issues highlighted. Furthermore, a broad look at responses to Africa's food security and agriculture crisis is presented in document AU/MIN/AGRI/3 (Item 3 of the Agenda). In essence, NEPAD aims for agriculture to deliver broad based economic advancement, to which other economic sectors, such as petroleum, minerals and tourism, may also contribute in significant ways, but cannot achieve on the same mass scale as agriculture. The NEPAD goal for the sector is an agricultural-led development that eliminates hunger, and reduces poverty and food insecurity, opening the way for export expansion. The vision for agriculture is that the continent should, by the year 2015:

Box 1: Ghana's Success in Reducing Chronic Food Insecurity

In recent decades, Ghana has achieved remarkable success in reducing the number of undernourished. From 1980 to 2000, the proportion of the population undernourished fell from 64 to 12 percent. During this period, the country's daily energy supply (DES) increased from 1600 to 2700 calories per capita per day. The increase in DES is due largely to greater food production. Maize and cassava, production increased quite strongly, while cassava and yam production rose dramatically, especially after 1991. A significant development because cassava has the highest calorie to price ratio in Ghana and because consumption of cassava and yam products reaches a peak in the "hunger season" just before harvest time.

Increases in area and yield contributed to boosting production. Investments in maize technology by national institutions and by NGOs paid off by raising maize yields from 1 mt/ha in the 1981/1985 period to 1.5 mt/ha in 1996/2000. Cassava production jumped by 260 percent, the largest increase of the 4 basic crops. Improved varieties developed by the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture played an important role in the rise of cassava production. Adoption was probably aided by widespread crop failure following the major drought in 1982/83. At that time, farmers turned to cassava because of its drought tolerant characteristics and because it produces relatively well in poorer soils, remaining in the ground for up to three years prior to harvest. An easily maintained food reserve.

As good as this news is, the prevalence and numbers of undernourished data alone do not provide an indication of changes in people's ability to purchase food. Additional information is required to obtain a more reliable picture of changes in chronic food security in the country. To better assess this situation, available estimates based on survey data indicate that food-poverty declined modestly, from nearly 37 to just under 27 percent between 1991/92 and 1998/99. Due largely to robust economic growth, rather than distributional changes. Anthropometric data suggest even more modest progress: the percentage of under 5 year olds who were moderately or severely stunted or underweight fell from 31 percent to 26 percent and from 27 percent to 25 percent between 1987/88 and 1998/2000, respectively.

Ghana's experience with increasing food production highlights the importance of investments in developing more productive staple food technologies and taking those new techniques to producers. The comparison of FAO's measure with other indicators of welfare suggests strongly that the key constraint to hunger reduction in Ghana may no longer be food availability, but access to food.

Economic growth has improved the food security prospects of many Ghanaians. In the future, policy makers will increasingly have to address the issue of how to make markets work better and improve access to food in those regions and for those households yet to benefit. Finally, as the data on under-nutrition of children under 5 years old suggests, other efforts, including targeting mother's education and nutrition, are also important and necessary activities if hunger is to be eliminated.

Box 2: Forestry Outlook Study for Africa6

The recently completed Forestry Outlook Study for Africa (FOSA) provides a 20-year perspective and long-term planning framework for development of the sector. The main outputs are an overview and five subregional reports that address issues pertaining to Central, East, North, Southern and West Africa. These reports identify driving forces, describe policies and institutional scenarios, assess implications for the future of forestry and present possible ways of increasing its contribution to sustainable development. Key findings and conclusions are summarized in the following.

FACTORS AFFECTING FORESTRY: Factors expected to have an impact on the forest sector over the next 20 years include:

  • the varying pace of political and institutional changes, especially democratization, decentralization and the involvement of stakeholders;
  • persistent conflict and war;
  • demographic changes, including an estimated population increase of around 400 million or 50 percent by 2020, as well as such factors as urbanization, population movements and HIV/AIDS;
  • the low growth in income, exacerbated by its very unequal distribution, accentuating poverty and therefore dependence on natural resources such as forests;
  • the high debt burden, declining development assistance, low levels of foreign direct investment and declining terms of trade;
  • emerging opportunities and constraints arising from globalization;
  • insufficient diversification of economies and the predominance of the informal sector;
  • inadequate investment in human resources and technology.

IMPLICATIONS: In the absence of any fundamental change, the forestry situation in Africa will be marked by:

  • continued land-use conflicts and loss of forest cover at roughly the current rate;
  • slow progress in applying sustainable forest management;
  • deterioration in the state of the environment, particularly exacerbation of the water crisis, increasing land degradation and desertification, and loss of biological diversity;
  • dependence on wood as a source of energy, increasing wood fuel consumption from about 635 million cubic metres in 2000 to about 850 million cubic metres in 2020;
  • depletion of NWFPs, most importantly medicinal plants;
  • increased conflicts in wildlife management, undermining the potential of wildlife as a source of bushmeat and protein for rural diets and impeding the expansion of wildlife-based tourism;
  • a significant decline in productivity and in purchasing capacity on national and local markets as a result of HIV/AIDS.

PRIORITIES AND STRATEGIES: Fundamental changes in priorities and strategies are needed over the next two decades if current trends are to be reversed, especially with a view to:

  • alleviating poverty, by emphasizing the production of basic goods and services and by generating income to meet basic needs;
  • protecting the environment, by conserving and rehabilitating watersheds, arresting land degradation and desertification and conserving biological diversity.

This involves empowering key actors and enhancing positive action by:

  • redefining the responsibilities of the public sector and enabling it to play a leading role in creating conditions for all stakeholders to function effectively;
  • supporting the development of an effective and transparent market mechanism;
  • improving the efficiency of the informal sector by providing legal, institutional and other support mechanisms.

The FOSA reports outline how these priorities and strategies could be adapted to each subregion. Follow-up will focus on incorporating the findings into national forest programmes. Specific attention will be paid to improving strategic planning capacities at the national and subregional levels.

Box 3: Food Emergencies in Africa

Following two successive years of poor harvests in most countries of southern Africa, a food crisis has emerged in the subregion. At present, 25 of the 31 countries experiencing severe food shortages and requiring international food assistance are in Africa.

In southern Africa, nearly 13 million people need emergency food aid following two consecutive poor cereal harvests. Large areas were devastated by a prolonged drought during the 2001/02 growing season, while others were affected by excessive rain. Government and farmers' maize stocks were depleted and imports were late and insufficient, resulting in severe food shortages and unprecedented price increases. In Zimbabwe, reduced plantings in the large-scale commercial sector due to land reform activities compounded the problem. A regional emergency operation valued at US$507.3  million was jointly approved by FAO and WFP in late June to provide food assistance to about 10.3 million people, 80 percent of the affected population, until the next main harvest from April 2003. However, by early August, only 25 percent of this amount had been pledged.

In eastern Africa, the food outlook is bleak in several countries due to poor seasonal rains. In Eritrea, the short rains from March to May failed totally and the drought continued into the important planting months of June and July, raising serious concerns over the country's prospective food security. Over one million people are currently in need of assistance. Similarly in Ethiopia, severe drought has caused the death of large numbers of livestock, mainly in the eastern and north-eastern pastoral areas. More than 8 million people are in need of assistance. In Kenya, poor rains have reversed earlier optimistic crop prospects and raised serious concerns over the food supply outlook. Nearly 1.3 million people are estimated to be dependent on food assistance. In Somalia, despite a favourable forecast for the main season crops, serious malnutrition rates are reported, reflecting successive droughts and long-term insecurity. The recent escalation of conflict has displaced a large number of people and disrupted delivery of food assistance. In Tanzania and Uganda, the overall food supply situation is satisfactory, although the escalation of conflict in northern Uganda has displaced large numbers of people, adding to the more than 1.5 million internally displaced persons, refugees and other vulnerable people that already depend on food assistance.

In western Africa, dry weather has seriously affected crops, particularly in The Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Mauritania and Senegal. In Cape Verde, prospects for the maize crop, normally planted from July, are unfavourable due to delayed onset of rains. By contrast, crop growing conditions have improved in central and eastern parts of the Sahel with increased and better distributed rainfall in most agricultural regions of Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali and Niger. Agricultural activities in Liberia have been disrupted by renewed civil strife, pointing to reduced rice production this year. Sierra Leone and Guinea remain heavily dependent on international food assistance due to large numbers of internally displaced persons and refugees.

In central Africa, the food supply situation has improved in Rwanda and Burundi following good harvests of the 2002 second season crops. By contrast, the food and nutritional situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo gives cause for serious concern. Persistent civil strife continues to cause massive population displacements, with the number of internally displaced persons currently estimated at 2 million. Their food situation is extremely serious, as distribution of relief assistance is hampered by insecurity. The food supply situation in Kinshasa is also serious, as food availability falls far short of needs.

Source: Food Outlook, April 2003

Box 4: NEPAD: Selected Impediments to African Agricultural Renewal

Introduction: The widespread hunger as well as the growing number of hard-core poor people on the continent are the distressing manifestations of prolonged decline caused by too limited investment. It is in view of the critical need for injection of new capital that investment is the focus under the three "pillars" of the CAADP: land and water management; infrastructure and trade-related capacities for improved market access; and food security - both as safety nets/response to emergencies and support to productivity increase in agriculture. Much of this intervention will consist of the "hardware" of agricultural development that is essential in responding to the crisis the sector is facing. Yet, Africa also needs to create enabling conditions to permanently reverse the decline and for this will need to pay attention to many other "software" interventions. Some of the "software" weaknesses as presented here have helped make the continent's agriculture low in productivity, uncompetitive, highly risky and dominated by low-value primary commodities.

Governance: Poor political and economic governance are twin root causes of much of the malaise that afflicts Africa. They create general political and economic uncertainty, an unpredictable environment for business, political unrest and, sometimes, even war that make pursuit of economic growth difficult. The issue of participation is also critical; IFAD observes for Western and Central Africa that "First and foremost, the poor have little or no voice in many major decisions affecting their livelihoods"7.

Policy and institutional weaknesses: Poor governance also creates an environment inimical to efficient investment of human and material resources and undermines formulation and implementation of policies and laws that can accelerate the process of economic growth and development. In the specific case of agriculture and rural development (broadly defined) improvements are sorely needed to adapt to changing market conditions and food security priorities. This involves overcoming institutional rigidities and ensuring: coherence of macro-economic frameworks. Policy, regulatory and institutional shifts are required to enable all levels of farming practice to have a stable engagement with natural resources and markets. New capacities in both the public and private sector are required; this calls for priority to investment in human and social capital. Systems of rights and land tenure arrangements need updating together with a reduction of gender-bias in policies.

Technological stagnation: African agriculture faces technological stagnation and needs to exit from excessive reliance on fickle weather conditions. It needs to increase the research and development effort as well as extension outreach. For better capacity to progress technologically and to close the technology gap, however, improved educational level of rural people is probably the most critical precondition. Combating HIV/AIDS, which in some countries is rapidly decimating the age groups with best potential for technologically upgrading agriculture, is essential.

Weakness of entrepreneurship and the private sector: Many African countries have no local private sector to speak of in the agricultural and agro-industry sectors. While it is now fashionable to speak of the African "smallholder" as the region's true private sector, the reality gives cause for great concern. The African smallholder of today may be private but lacks education; has severely limited access to communications or physical infrastructure; suffers poor health and nutrition; lacks remunerative markets and access to yield-enhancing inputs; faces competition with products from abroad that have been subsidised by more money than s/he can ever dream of. This farmer may constitute a "private sector" but cannot stand alongside and compete with multinational farming and agroindustry giants that trade with Africa. Whether labelled as private sector or otherwise, the smallholder farmer class also often suffers marginalisation, with no voice to influence policy in favour of its mainstay activity and to secure support services that are tailored to its particular needs. Africa cannot afford to be lured into complacency by references to a large smallholder private sector; it needs to develop a true rural entrepreneurial capacity. Successful entrepreneurship requires fair prospects for competitive access to markets both at home and internationally and the information to enable the farmer get the best from such markets.

HIV/AIDS: Sub-Saharan Africa is at the epicentre of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, where over 25 million people (some 70 percent of the known global total) are living with HIV. The majority of those who suffer the impact of the epidemic live in the countryside and are extremely poor. The short-term effects on production and income are staggering in the labour-based economies of the poor. While production and incomes decline, families concurrently experience dramatic rises in health and death-related expenditures. The longer-term effects on the inter-generational transfer of knowledge, on traditional social security mechanisms, and on basic demographic and socio-economic characteristics of these societies are likely to be even greater. The HIV/AIDS epidemic is creating a new poverty dynamic. It is also partly driven by poverty, since this induces some people into high-risk situations and activities such as prostitution and migrant activities - poor women are particularly vulnerable. The gravity of and scale of the HIV epidemic is such that development interventions in all sectors - and particularly those in the rural areas where the majority of the affected live - need to face the issue head on.

Other concerns: The diversity of areas requiring attention is nearly limitless. From this can be selected: (a) inadequate targeting of attention on the particular needs of women who are the dominant agricultural producers, traders and nutrition providers in many parts of Africa; (b) limited specialisation in production and inadequate significance of any one country or of the region to influence global markets; (c) unclear definition of roles among the public, private and civil society institutions in development; (d) poor harmonisation of agricultural development promoting initiatives at national, sub-regional and continental levels; (e) inability to systematically mobilise savings for reinvestment; (f) disengagement from or poor performance of cash crops that were formerly important for rural incomes.


1 Creation of a Common African Market for Agricultural Products: Issues, Choices and the Way Forward. Draft manuscript. Interim Commission of the African Union, Addis Ababa, May 2003.
2 T. Morris, Special Envoy of the Secretary-General for Humanitarian Needs in Southern Africa: Report of the First Mission to Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Swaziland, Zimbabwe and Zambia, dated 24 September 2002.
3 SADC Food Security Ministerial Brief: 28 Feb 2003.
4 T. Morris, Special Envoy of the Secretary-General for Humanitarian Needs in Southern Africa: Report of the First Mission to Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Swaziland, Zimbabwe and Zambia, dated 24 September 2002.
5 New Partnership For Africa's Development (NEPAD), Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme, November 2002 (Draft).
6 FAO, State of the World's Forests 2003.
7 IFAD Strategy for rural poverty reduction in Western and Central Africa: http://www.ifad.org/operations/regional/2002/pa/pa.htm